Moneytrack

I just finished reading "Moneyball," by Michael Lewis, the surprisingly engrossing story of how the Oakland A's used statistical data to build a winning team. Like a lot of other racing fans, I have an overlapping interest in baseball stats, and I find it fascinating to follow another sport also afflicted with a sclerotic power structure, dominated by people who believe they know everything about their fans and how to put on the show or market their data. The result, a collective failure of imagination leading to a management culture more interested in brand caretaking than innovation, opens up intriguing little niches, exploitable market inefficiencies. In the late-1990s in baseball, the inefficiency was in statistical analysis, in the mid-2000s in racing, the inefficiency is in technology, which no one has quite figured out yet ...

Related: Over on Handride, Patrick picks up on the news that Intel is producing chips that will substantially improve online video quality, sees a glorious opportunity for the industry.

[Posted by JC, November 15, 2007 8:00 AM]

Archives > Racing & Technology

Comments

I agree, for some reason the horse racing community seems to remain in the dark ages as far as technology goes. However the track I grew up near, Arlington, seemed to be so far ahead of its time then, I only wonder if it still is. I'd bet they still have the same technology that was "cutting edge" now as was there in 1992. Hopefully the horse racing circle will come out of the dark ages.

- Posted by Jason, November 15, 2007 4:52 PM
---